From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Fri Dec 06 16:59:54 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:59:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18KTJu-0005ZG-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:59:50 -0800 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:59:50 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: cmegadri valfendi preti Message-ID: <20021207005950.GD28980@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20021206195506.O85943-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021206195506.O85943-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 3186 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 07:56:24PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, And Rosta wrote: > > > > Do you think so? Personally, I don't think I am capable of parsing > > the phonological string without the aid of pragmatics (i.e. knowing > > in advance what it is that you are likely to be saying). > > > I can assure you that pragmatics provides most of the understanding in > actual Lojban conversation. I would say 'context' rather than 'pragmatics', but I *strongly* agree with xod. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi