From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Fri Dec 06 17:58:22 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 06 Dec 2002 17:58:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lmsmtp05.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.115])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18KUEU-0006WC-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 17:58:18 -0800
Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-63-172.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.63.172])
	by lmsmtp05.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1121FC6D
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat,  7 Dec 2002 02:57:44 +0100 (MET)
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] Re: Old questions, still unanswered. 
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 01:59:55 -0000
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMIEPMHAAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <20021207010428.GB93052@allusion.net>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Importance: Normal
X-archive-position: 3190
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

Jordan:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 12:49:20AM -0000, And Rosta wrote:
> > Avital:
> > > a) Is "ko'a broda je brode" equivelant to "ko'a broda gi'e brode"?
> > 
> > Yes, I think 
> 
> The correct answer is "no" 
> 
> "the rule of expansion into separate bridi simply does not always 
> work for tanru
> connection."
> in chap 14, sec 12, with example 

Avital asks if these two sentences are equivalent, and it is not
obvious to me how your quotation bears on this. Can you think of
values for ko'a, broda and brode that would make one sentence true
and the other false? I can't, but maybe you can, which is why I
hedged. If you can, give example values. 

--And.