From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Sat Dec 07 16:04:50 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 07 Dec 2002 16:04:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lmsmtp03.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.113])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18KowA-0001Xx-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 16:04:46 -0800
Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-59-137.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.59.137])
	by lmsmtp03.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89DB3D43F
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun,  8 Dec 2002 01:04:13 +0100 (MET)
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] [h] (was: RE: Re: Aesthetics
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 00:06:25 -0000
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMCECEHBAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFCEEFCNAA.raganok@intrex.net>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Importance: Normal
X-archive-position: 3256
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

Craig to Jordan:
> >Why is [h] not an optimal pronunciation for '?  (Yes I know the
> >title of the thread is 'aesthetics', but you seem to be implying
> >there's some kind of reason) 
> 
> Because there is a greater phonic contrast between [T] and [f] or [s] than
> between [h] and [x] 

Furthermore, [ihi] is so difficult to articulate that I think we can
safely assume that nobody actually does say [ihi].

In other words, the problem is not only that [h] and [x] are rather
similar in isolation, but that there are phonological environments
where the contrast is unfeasibly difficult. I have seen it claimed
that [h] and [x] never contrast in natural languages, though John
has told me that he indirectly infers such a contrast from descriptions 
of Irish.

> Of course, even [T] isn't optimal if you can pronounce certain other sounds 
> A Welsh ll, for example, is a lateral fricative; this is an acceptable '
> sound. Since Lojban has only one lateral sound, l, which does not *need* to
> be pronounced laterally, the most contrasting pronunciation would be a velar
> l (like in English) and a lateral ' 
> 
> I use [T], but only because I can't get the ll sound 

I have recently been experimenting with the lateral fricative.
(As a realization of /'/, I mean!)

--And.