From fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com Sat Dec 07 18:32:51 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 07 Dec 2002 18:32:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18KrFP-0003S8-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 18:32:47 -0800
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gB82d8G9021784
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 20:39:08 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gB82d8iK021783
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 20:39:08 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 20:39:08 -0600
From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: nelci
Message-ID: <20021208023908.GB21580@allusion.net>
References: <3DFF06C3@webmail.uic.edu> <3DF2A11A.4010807@bilkent.edu.tr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3DF2A11A.4010807@bilkent.edu.tr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 3275
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 03:32:10AM +0200, Robin Turner wrote:
> sbelknap wrote:
[...]
> >When we discussed what <nelci> means, we both realized that we had been=
=20
> >miscommunicating in English. He is using a different negation scheme tha=
n=20
> >I am. I tried to explain lojban negation to him, but I soon realized tha=
t=20
> >I do not have a firm grasp on this myself, so I'm going to have to rerea=
d=20
> >what John
> >  had to say about negation. As I recall, the grammar is quite lucid on=
=20
> >  this topic.
>=20
> zo'o "lucid" is a strong word to use about anything to do with negation.=
=20
>  But in this case it's pretty straightforward.  Your son, as a good=20
> lobypre, is saying {mi na nelci da} (It is not the case that I like X)=20
> and you are hearing {mi na'e nelci da} (I have a relationship other than=
=20
> liking with X).

I was thinking to'e, actually.

[...]
--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
                                     sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE98rDMDrrilS51AZ8RAlXrAKCcyeag4EVlqxCWaVyankVWH9+GoQCcDyOR
RRjUZ7+V6i3xqHNgwy8W7Qk=
=GLMD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50--