From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Sun Dec 08 14:06:28 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 08 Dec 2002 14:06:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from lmsmtp04.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.114]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18L9Yo-00067K-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 14:06:02 -0800 Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-61-144.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.61.144]) by lmsmtp04.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA41D4864B for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 23:05:30 +0100 (MET) From: "And Rosta" To: Subject: [lojban] Re: cmegadri valfendi preti Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 22:07:42 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <02120806143407.19670@neofelis> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal X-archive-position: 3306 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list pier: > The problem with section 16 is that it cannot be extended to fu'ivla longer > than 6 letters which end in CCVVCV, and is very difficult to extend to longer > fu'ivla of whatever form. I have a proposal that works for a large class of > fu'ivla, including both CCVVCV and all type-3's that end in a single vowel, > and have only to code it up and prove it Is your proposal on the wiki? Seeing as you are our main fuhivla wonk, I imagine that the BF would tend to look to you for 'expert opinion' in the first instance. --And.