From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Sun Dec 08 14:37:04 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 08 Dec 2002 14:37:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=neofelis.ixazon.lan) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LA2m-0006kL-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 14:37:00 -0800 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 324AE3C477; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 17:36:28 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Pierre Abbat To: Subject: [lojban] Re: cmegadri valfendi preti Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 17:36:26 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0212081736270A.19670@neofelis> X-archive-position: 3309 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sunday 08 December 2002 17:07, And Rosta wrote: > pier: > > The problem with section 16 is that it cannot be extended to fu'ivla > > longer than 6 letters which end in CCVVCV, and is very difficult to > > extend to longer fu'ivla of whatever form. I have a proposal that works > > for a large class of fu'ivla, including both CCVVCV and all type-3's that > > end in a single vowel, and have only to code it up and prove it > > Is your proposal on the wiki? Seeing as you are our main fuhivla wonk, > I imagine that the BF would tend to look to you for 'expert opinion' > in the first instance. It's on the page [rafsi fu'ivla]. phma