From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Dec 09 12:38:15 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:38:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18LUfK-0007E1-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:38:10 -0800 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 12:38:10 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: name of the language Message-ID: <20021209203810.GU6170@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <5.2.0.9.0.20021209144235.03bab1d0@pop.east.cox.net> <62D2FB43-0BB4-11D7-BDFB-000393629ED4@uic.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <62D2FB43-0BB4-11D7-BDFB-000393629ED4@uic.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 3349 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:25:41PM -0600, Steven Belknap wrote: > I guess that is why lojban gets no higher than 13th on google, while > the first 12 hits are all Loglan sites. I really want to know what bizarre search you were running here. When *I* enter 'lojban' into google, the first obvious loglan site that comes up is hit #32. The second is ba'e #83, and that's actually a mixed lojban/loglan reference page. That same one comes up again at #119. #158 is a page on the BBC site that mentions both. #160 mentions loglan in the context of basting lojban for being a crappy IL. At that point I stopped. What are *you* seeing? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi