From raganok@intrex.net Mon Dec 09 18:35:12 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 09 Dec 2002 18:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18LaEm-0006HM-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 18:35:08 -0800
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.38] by smtp.intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-5.05) id A2FC34600C4; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 21:35:40 -0500
From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] Re: My next suggestion
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 21:35:11 -0500
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFGEHCCNAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
In-Reply-To: <3E053088@webmail.uic.edu>
Importance: Normal
X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.38]
X-Note: Total weight is 0. Whitelisted
X-archive-position: 3375
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: raganok@intrex.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

>4. There is no downside if we have some content for these conlangs, such as
>word lists which translate selected LLG Loglan words into these other
>languages. (First principle of proper keyword selection: there should be
>actual content directly relevant to a keyword at the site.)

"stuffing the content of the web pages with the keywords"

>My proposal: the ten most popular conlangs should be mentioned on the LLG

I decline to deal with the multiple problems of this plan. However, one
quick quetion: Which ten? Many top-ten lists get silly, and include things
with no actual speakers, such as Nadsat.

>Hasn't anybody here read the cluetrain manifesto? http://www.cluetrain.org/

So just because you have a pseudocool name for yourself you are an
authority?