From araizen@newmail.net Tue Dec 10 02:04:46 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Dec 2002 02:04:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.16.30] ident=exim)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18LhFq-0006vy-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 02:04:43 -0800
Received: from gx-57.cs.huji.ac.il
	([132.65.180.57] helo=newmail.net ident=araizen)
	by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp
	id 18LhFk-0004rW-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 12:04:36 +0200
Message-ID: <3DF5BC34.4060701@newmail.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 12:04:36 +0200
From: Adam Raizen <araizen@newmail.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: let's get rid of this lojban == loglan crap (was Re:
 tags)
References: <3E04B1D8@webmail.uic.edu> <20021210034233.GB44058@allusion.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
X-archive-position: 3386
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: araizen@newmail.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

la djorden. cusku di'e

> I'm not a LLG member, so I can't official propose this for the next
> meeting (afaik).  However, as a member of the community I would
> like to ask that at the next LLG meeting the "lojban is loglan"
> statement be considered for revokation.

There was a very difficult and expensive legal battle fought over this, 
and those who participated in it would probably not want their effort to 
be nullified, and historically Lojban is related to Loglan, so at least 
for those reasons it would probably be difficult to straight-out revoke 
the "lojban is loglan" statement. I think that a clarification is in 
order, though.

mu'o mi'e .adam.