From sbelknap@uic.edu Tue Dec 10 14:17:11 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:17:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from larch.cc.uic.edu ([128.248.155.164]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Lsgd-0006EX-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:17:07 -0800 Received: (qmail 12552 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2002 22:17:00 -0000 Received: from cis5044.uicomp.uic.edu (HELO uic.edu) (128.248.250.44) by larch.cc.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Dec 2002 22:17:00 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:16:39 -0600 Subject: [lojban] Re: let's get rid of this lojban == loglan crap (was Re: tags) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v548) Cc: lojban-list@lojban.org, araizen@newmail.net To: John Cowan From: Steven Belknap In-Reply-To: <200212101510.KAA29566@mail2.reutershealth.com> Message-Id: <0E1DE75C-0C8D-11D7-A99A-000393629ED4@uic.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.548) X-archive-position: 3421 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: sbelknap@uic.edu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 08:58 AM, John Cowan wrote: > Steven Belknap scripsit: > >> I shall be most intrigued to learn of a "clarification" that refutes >> my >> assertion that Loglan is the English word for what lojbanistanis refer >> to as lojban in their native language. Do you have such a >> "clarification"? > > "Assertion" is the operative word. That is why I chose it.