From araizen@newmail.net Wed Dec 11 09:13:30 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:13:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.16.30] ident=exim)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18MAQH-0000Rz-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:13:26 -0800
Received: from xil-26.cs.huji.ac.il
	([132.65.181.26] helo=newmail.net ident=araizen)
	by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp
	id 18MAQD-000KAa-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 19:13:21 +0200
Message-ID: <3DF77231.2080802@newmail.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 19:13:21 +0200
From: Adam Raizen <araizen@newmail.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: html tag ethics
References: <E271E0E4-0C90-11D7-A99A-000393629ED4@uic.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
X-archive-position: 3452
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: araizen@newmail.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

la stivn. cusku di'e

> I believe that "LLG Loglan" is clearly distinct from 
> "TLI Loglan" If I prefer to use this term and my readers or listeners 
> understand me, what harm is done?

I believe that "gubblick" is clearly distinct from "phrase". If I prefer 
to use this term and my readers or listeners understand me, what harm is 
done?

mu'o mi'e .adam.