From sentto-44114-17914-1039554697-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Wed Dec 11 22:46:45 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:46:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from n15.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.70]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18MN7I-0006Q0-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:46:40 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-17914-1039554697-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.200] by n15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Dec 2002 21:11:37 -0000 X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 10 Dec 2002 21:11:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 31032 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2002 21:11:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Dec 2002 21:11:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2002 21:11:36 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.38] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A8AE2B5F00AA; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:12:14 -0500 To: Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.38] X-Note: Total weight is 0. Whitelisted X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:11:33 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: My next suggestion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 3467 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list >> I decline to deal with the multiple problems of this plan. However, one >> quick quetion: Which ten? Many top-ten lists get silly, and include >> things >> with no actual speakers, such as Nadsat. >I don't see any problems whatsoever. TLI Loglan, Esperanto, klingon, >Interlingua there's four. Do you know another that is more widely used >than any of those? (I hope so. I've never heard anybody speak >Interlingua!) If so, we have five. Only five to go. Quenya? Sindarin? Laadan? But this is meaningless. There is no connection, NONE, between Lojban and Quenya. To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/