From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Tue Dec 17 19:17:41 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:17:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=neofelis.ixazon.lan) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18OUhZ-0001Qi-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:16:53 -0800 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id CA5833C478; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:16:17 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: bridling hostility (was: RE: Re: the ethics of the HTML content meta tag Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:16:14 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <1039702042024396@lycos-europe.com> <3DF8A82A.5060907@bilkent.edu.tr> In-Reply-To: <3DF8A82A.5060907@bilkent.edu.tr> X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0212172216141B.03697@neofelis> X-archive-position: 3585 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thursday 12 December 2002 10:15, Robin Turner wrote: > It was pretty vituperous about six years ago, if I remember rightly. > There were just fewer people around to vituperate, and the vituperations > tended to be about more obscure issues. > > I agree that a little more politeness is in order. Perhaps we could > agree that all insulting messages should be posted in Lojban. If > nothing else it would be more amusing: > > le do mamta cu nalrebysmacu .ije le do patfu se steci le panci pei jbari > .i mi carna gi'e sputu fo do > > (sorry, I'm not up to coining a lujvo/fu'ivla for "elderberry" at the > moment, nor to rendering "in your general direction") sambuku mu'omi'e pier.