From Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de Mon Jan 06 10:04:39 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 06 Jan 2003 10:04:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from spree.gedas.de ([139.1.44.12]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Vbc1-0007QS-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 10:04:33 -0800 Received: from spree.gedas.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spree.gedas.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA09147 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:03:59 +0100 (MET) Received: from blnsem05.de.gedas.vwg (blnsem05.gedas.de [139.1.84.49]) by spree.gedas.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA09140; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:03:58 +0100 (MET) Received: by blnsem05.de.gedas.vwg with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:03:58 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Newton, Philip" To: "'Robin Lee Powell'" Cc: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Lojban Wiki front page hacked Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:03:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-archive-position: 3714 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 04:49:55PM +0100, Newton, Philip wrote: > > Hi, not sure whether you're the right person to contact; if not, > > please forward. > > > > Looks like someone hacked the Lojban Wiki on > > http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/ . > > Ooooooo! Very impressive hacking a wiki!! Yeah, but wasn't the Front Page write-protected? At least it used to be on the old Wiki (nuzban.wiw.org). > > You may wish to restore it, either from backup or something such as > > > http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/FrontPage?action=diff&previous=author > > Done. Thanks. Um? I still see the hacked version. Or should I say, "I see the hacked version again"; diff says Newer page: version 24 Last edited on January 6, 2003 10:01 am. by 1 Older page: version 22 Last edited on January 6, 2003 9:51 am. by RobinLeePowell So they just went and overwrote your changes. Maybe there's a process sitting around in the background? Cheers, Philip