From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Fri Jan 17 10:49:43 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:49:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18ZbYe-0000he-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:49:38 -0800 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D3CED493D; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:48:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Abbat Organization: dis To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Some comments on the FAQ Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:48:42 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200301171348.42580.phma@webjockey.net> X-archive-position: 3817 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Friday 17 January 2003 08:46, Newton, Philip wrote: > So I'm not sure that the example is that good. (I don't have a better one, > however. {pitsa} would be even worse since it's a valid gismu form. Not > sure whether there are any other good "quintessential examples", as the FAQ > calls it, of fu'ivla.) I'm not sure what "quintessential example" means, but there are lots of fu'ivla, and a couple of lujvo made of fu'ivla, in the taxonomy chart (http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/Taxonomy). phma