From sentto-44114-18306-1042833931-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Fri Jan 17 12:06:36 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:06:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from n17.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.72]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Zcl5-0001Hp-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:06:31 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-18306-1042833931-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.201] by n17.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jan 2003 20:05:35 -0000 X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 17 Jan 2003 20:05:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 89619 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2003 20:05:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Jan 2003 20:05:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao03.cox.net) (68.1.17.242) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2003 20:05:33 -0000 Received: from lojban.lojban.org ([68.100.206.153]) by lakemtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP id <20030117200534.WZS8666.lakemtao03.cox.net@lojban.lojban.org> for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:05:34 -0500 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030117150107.033994f0@pop.east.cox.net> X-Sender: rlechevalier@pop.east.cox.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <200301171348.42580.phma@webjockey.net> References: From: Robert LeChevalier X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbab MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:02:34 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: Some comments on the FAQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 3818 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list At 01:48 PM 1/17/03 -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: >On Friday 17 January 2003 08:46, Newton, Philip wrote: > > So I'm not sure that the example is that good. (I don't have a better one, > > however. {pitsa} would be even worse since it's a valid gismu form. Not > > sure whether there are any other good "quintessential examples", as the FAQ > > calls it, of fu'ivla.) > >I'm not sure what "quintessential example" means, but there are lots of >fu'ivla, and a couple of lujvo made of fu'ivla, in the taxonomy chart >(http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/Taxonomy). There are no officially approved Type IV fu'ivla, and I think Nick is planning not to approve any for the dictionary - only type IIIs. -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/