From sentto-44114-18307-1042834225-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Fri Jan 17 12:11:26 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:11:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from n19.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.74]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Zcpl-0001Jv-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:11:21 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-18307-1042834225-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.194] by n19.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jan 2003 20:10:25 -0000 X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 17 Jan 2003 20:10:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 96035 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2003 20:10:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Jan 2003 20:10:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao02.cox.net) (68.1.17.243) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2003 20:10:24 -0000 Received: from lojban.lojban.org ([68.100.206.153]) by lakemtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP id <20030117201024.WEL6744.lakemtao02.cox.net@lojban.lojban.org> for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:10:24 -0500 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030117150301.03398090@pop.east.cox.net> X-Sender: rlechevalier@pop.east.cox.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: From: Robert LeChevalier X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbab MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:07:23 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: Some comments on the FAQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 3819 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list At 02:17 PM 1/17/03 +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote: > >And vlatai claims that {spageti} is a valid stage-4 fu'ivla (while not > >recognising {djarspageti} as type-3 lujvo with short rafsi). > >{djarspageti} is NOT a type-3 fu'ivla. Only consonant ending >rafsi can be used in type-3. That is NOT what CLL says, and it uses djarspageti as an example. >{djarspageti} happens to be a >valid fu'ivla, but for example {djarpitsa} is not (it fails >slinku'i). Could you explain how it fails slinku'i? lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/