From sentto-44114-18387-1043456759-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Fri Jan 24 17:11:26 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 24 Jan 2003 17:11:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from n36.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.104]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18cEqw-0007Mb-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 17:11:22 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-18387-1043456759-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.200] by n36.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Jan 2003 01:05:59 -0000 X-Sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 25 Jan 2003 01:05:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 81934 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2003 01:05:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Jan 2003 01:05:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lmsmtp04.st1.spray.net) (212.78.202.114) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Jan 2003 01:05:57 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-70-72.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.70.72]) by lmsmtp04.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2C347E90 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 02:05:56 +0100 (MET) To: "Lojban List" Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <200301241633.04334.phma@webjockey.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 01:05:53 -0000 Subject: [lojban] Re: valfendi algorithm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 3900 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Pierre: > On Friday 24 January 2003 15:47, And Rosta wrote: > > I don't see that as a pronounceability issue, though. It's more like > > English restrictions against CrVr & VVN (N = ng, VV = double vowel) > > -- they're pronounceable but still prohibited > > Can a boing be prerecorded in a television show? onomatopoeic words are allowed to violate phonotactic restrictions so long as they are pronounceable. In English, that is. Not in Standard Lojban, though since the Lojban restrictions on consonant cooccurrence are ill-motivated, I don't see why they need apply to other dialects. --And. To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/