From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sat Feb 01 08:36:36 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 01 Feb 2003 08:36:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18f0d5-0006Dn-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 08:36:31 -0800 Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 08:36:31 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Ungrammatical examples in CLL Message-ID: <20030201163631.GD13520@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 3973 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 03:25:37PM +0000, Martin Bays wrote: > Further to the problems with prenex-connective interaction - > > 16.10.5: > roda zo'u mi prami da .ije naku zo'u do prami da > > and 16.10.6: > su'oda zo'u mi prami da .ije naku zo'u do prami da > > do not parse. Try them on jbofihe. You can use ge...gi instead, and > that seems fine, but (as I mentioned the other day) it looks like you > can't have individually prenexed sentences connected in afterthought. > > Damned annoying, if you ask me. For the record, jbofi'e has been shown to have errors before. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi