From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Feb 03 10:08:24 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 03 Feb 2003 10:08:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18fl0z-0004PV-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 10:08:17 -0800 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:08:17 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: broda brode ==? brode co broda Message-ID: <20030203180817.GC13520@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 3992 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:47:59AM +0100, Newton, Philip wrote: > Is {ko'a broda brode} (with no further places filled), in general, > identical in meaning to {ko'a brode co broda}? In other words, does > tanru inversion with {co} result in the same meaning? Except for emphasis, yes. -Robin, who may be wrong, but the fastest way to get corrected is to state a wrong answer. 8) -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi