From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Feb 03 11:42:20 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 03 Feb 2003 11:42:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18fmTv-0005PO-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 11:42:15 -0800 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:42:15 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Wierdness with lerfu strings. Message-ID: <20030203194215.GA20552@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 3996 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list la byfy. broda parses in jbofi'e, but le broda poi la byfy. broda does not. Not that "le broda poi byfy. broda" works. That seems very wrong. More interestingly, jbofi'e says that "la byfy. broda" is equivalent to "la broda po byfy.", which is certainly not what I was expecting. "la byfy. cu broda" doesn't work. Apparently, lerfu strings cannot be names. Was that intentional? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi