From sentto-44114-18635-1046217561-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Tue Feb 25 16:00:03 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:00:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from n26.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.82]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 18nozM-0003ZN-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:59:56 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-18635-1046217561-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.201] by n26.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Feb 2003 23:59:22 -0000 X-Sender: opoudjis@optushome.com.au X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 25 Feb 2003 23:59:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 52537 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2003 23:59:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Feb 2003 23:59:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.its.unimelb.EDU.AU) (128.250.20.112) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2003 23:59:20 -0000 Received: from [128.250.86.174] (fritslite.language.unimelb.edu.au [128.250.86.174]) by SMTP.UNIMELB.EDU.AU (PMDF V5.2-29 #46888) with ESMTP id <01KSW3MBR3BY97N1XP@SMTP.UNIMELB.EDU.AU> for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:59:17 +1100 X-Sender: opoudjis@mail.optushome.com.au To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Message-id: From: Nick Nicholas X-Yahoo-Profile: opoudjis MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:58:37 +1100 Subject: [lojban] Re: Nick will be with you shortly Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 4147 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: opoudjis@optushome.com.au Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list No problem, Craig. Now, it *is* true that I will be pushing a solution to {loi}, in a few months, based on what has been going on in jboske; and there will be other things coming out of jboske from time to time. But that does not mean the rest of BPFK has to accept it; jboske is a faction (I guess) and a forum, but it won't be a cabal, both because its discussions are public, and because it's really only 3 or 4 people. jboske has a mission (get its shit together for the BPFK), but no mandate: it is the BPFK which has that mandate. Now, I'll be royally pissed off if the BPFK says my solution is too baroque to be acceptable (or that there is no problem with {loi} to be solved), but I'll just have to lump it. I may start acting cabal-ish in the months ahead. I trust you all will call me out on this if I do. My major remaining task, which I'll have to do next week, is to write a sample definition of a cmavo; that will be {nau}, and I'll be trying it out on jbovlaste. Again, sorry for delay and chaos, and the regularly scheduled programme will commence soon. -- **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** * Dr Nick Nicholas, French & Italian Studies nickn@unimelb.edu.au * University of Melbourne, Australia http://www.opoudjis.net * "Eschewing obfuscatory verbosity of locutional rendering, the * circumscriptional appelations are excised." --- W. Mann & S. Thompson, * _Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organisation_, 1987. * **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/