From ragnarok@pobox.com Mon Mar 03 16:02:35 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 03 Mar 2003 16:02:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 18pzss-0003OT-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 16:02:14 -0800
Received: from craig [209.42.200.67] by smtp.intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-7.13) id ACD7998A0148; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 19:01:27 -0500
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] Re: The Any thread
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:01:50 -0500
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFGECJDBAA.ragnarok@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <3E63EABC.4090705@bilkent.edu.tr>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
X-Declude-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com [209.42.200.67]
X-archive-position: 4315
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

>> No it isn't.  mi nitcu lo mikce == Ex(Mx & Nmx).  

>Sorry, but I don't understand that.  Can anyone put it into predicate 
>logic for me?

I don't speak logic, but I glorked it as something vaguely like:

There exists an x such that ([x Mikce] and [m {mi?} Nitcu x]