From skorgu@vr00m.net Tue Mar 04 05:21:57 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 04 Mar 2003 05:21:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp03.wlv.untd.com ([209.247.163.66]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 18qCMh-0008U0-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 05:21:51 -0800 Received: (qmail 12195 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 13:21:18 -0000 Received: from dialup-209.246.92.231.dial1.newyork1.level3.net (HELO vr00m.net) (209.246.92.231) by smtp03.wlv.untd.com with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 13:21:18 -0000 Message-ID: <3E64A842.7000500@vr00m.net> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 08:21:06 -0500 From: skorgu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: [Announcement] jbovlaste 0.7 References: <20030303051126.GO7560@digitalkingdom.org> <20030303060800.GP7560@digitalkingdom.org> <3E634561.3050004@vr00m.net> <200303031624.h23GOtfO012144@express.cec.wustl.edu> <20030303165445.GR7560@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20030303165445.GR7560@digitalkingdom.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.73.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-archive-position: 4334 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: skorgu@vr00m.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Robin Lee Powell wrote: .ui Magnificent! yes, I think trivial is quite sufficient! *grin* Now I have to get down to deciphering the DAML ontologies and mastering jbovlaste itself. Thanks! | That would be trivial, actually. Patrick, would that be sufficient? | | -Robin | | On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 10:24:54AM -0600, Adam Lopresto wrote: | > It looks like it already accepts definitions in a whole mabla-load of | > languages, so I wonder whether there could be created a | > pseudo-language for the RDF definitions. | > | > > Without making a whole load of work, how complicated would it be to add | > > another, parallel definition set? | > > | > > To clarify: I think lojban would be very useful as a language for | querying | > > the (admittedly poorly documented) emerging standards of RDF-based | ontologies | > > and whatever semantic web is built around them. I would like to be | able to | > > have an ontology->lojban correspondance table side-by-side with the | regular | > > lojban -> natlang translations/parsings/glossings/wawa. | > > | > > If this would be an absurd amount of work, don't bother. There's | no reason | > > that this kind of thing needs to be done in jbovlaste, but it seems | to me | > > that having the correspondances somewhat open to group effort and | discussion | > > would benefit the language. | | -- | http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. | .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu | .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai | http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi | | | | | *Yahoo! Groups Sponsor* | ADVERTISEMENT | | | | To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com | | Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service | . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+ZKhBjxlO/uCfO6MRAkWgAJwI7URye2OLpX0ItvQagk4uAPqLmgCeKunP W4FFaEWhR0jXMznzZLPIjY0= =HJBc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----