From gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch Wed Mar 05 03:07:40 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 05 Mar 2003 03:07:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.bluewin.ch ([195.186.4.73])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 18qWim-0003zr-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2003 03:06:04 -0800
Received: from oemcomputer (62.202.159.237) by mail2.bluewin.ch (Bluewin AG 6.7.015)
        id 3E1029A20064B41A for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:05:39 +0000
Message-ID: <001801c2e306$ffe06480$ed9fca3e@oemcomputer>
From: "G. Dyke" <gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch>
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0303050713090.8280-100000@party.lan.ice.ru> <Pine.LNX.4.52.0303050827130.12536@hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no>
Subject: [lojban] Re: cukta
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 12:04:18 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-archive-position: 4347
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

cu'u la arnt.

> On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Cyril Slobin wrote:
> 
> > If I have two works by two different authors bound together into one
> > volume, is it one cukta or two?
> 
> pe'i re cukta gi'e pa selpapri

how does the grammar of that work? wouldn't {e} be better?