From jcowan@reutershealth.com Tue Mar 11 11:02:54 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:02:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [65.246.141.36] (helo=mail.reutershealth.com) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18sp0e-0002wo-00; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:01:56 -0800 Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (mail [65.246.141.36]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA23535; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 13:58:56 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200303111858.NAA23535@mail.reutershealth.com> Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:01:52 -0500 From: John Cowan Subject: [lojban] Re: [lojban.org #92] Re: Your lujvo records in Jbovlaste To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:01:52 -0500 (EST) Cc: rt-jvs@lojban.org (Arnt Richard Johansen via RT), lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20030311185609.GK5580@digitalkingdom.org> from "Robin Lee Powell" at Mar 11, 2003 10:56:09 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 4432 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Robin Lee Powell scripsit: > Just making that specific because I realized that otherwise lujvo that > start with x could be ambiguous. In that case, the user should put more > than one letter after the lujvo term, just to be extra clear: In Woldy (but it may not be true in Noralujv) I always use a two-letter abbreviation when a gismu begins with x. > x1=xi3=xa2 Just so. -- John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan Assent may be registered by a signature, a handshake, or a click of a computer mouse transmitted across the invisible ether of the Internet. Formality is not a requisite; any sign, symbol or action, or even willful inaction, as long as it is unequivocally referable to the promise, may create a contract. --_Specht v. Netscape_