From rspeer@MIT.EDU Tue Mar 11 11:09:46 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:09:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu ([18.7.21.83]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18sp87-00038I-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:09:39 -0800 Received: from grand-central-station.mit.edu (GRAND-CENTRAL-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.82]) by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA14102 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:09:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (MELBOURNE-CITY-STREET.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.86]) by grand-central-station.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA04392 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:06:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from torg.mit.edu (RANDOM-THREE-NINETY-SIX.MIT.EDU [18.243.6.141]) ) by melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h2BJ3N0x014171 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:03:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from rob by torg.mit.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18sp22-0001lx-00 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:03:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:03:22 -0500 From: Rob Speer To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: [lojban.org #92] Re: Your lujvo records in Jbovlaste Message-ID: <20030311190322.GB6737@mit.edu> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030311184941.GI5580@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030311184941.GI5580@digitalkingdom.org> X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 4434 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rspeer@MIT.EDU Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 10:49:41AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > That's a good point. The easy and obvious solution is: > > x1=a1=b1 Perhaps "x1:a1=b1" would make it more clear that it's telling you about the argument order, not that it's a 3-place lujvo. Also, does this mean that components like xamgu1 should be written as xa1 and not x1? -- Rob Speer