From sentto-44114-18951-1047566207-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Thu Mar 13 06:37:41 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 13 Mar 2003 06:37:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from n38.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.106]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 18tTpe-0002fG-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 06:37:18 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-18951-1047566207-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.196] by n38.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Mar 2003 14:36:47 -0000 X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 13 Mar 2003 14:36:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 38792 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2003 14:36:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Mar 2003 14:36:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n17.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.72) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2003 14:36:46 -0000 Received: from [66.218.67.145] by n17.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Mar 2003 14:36:46 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20030312175019.GD3482@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster From: "jjllambias2000" X-Originating-IP: 200.49.74.2 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:36:46 -0000 Subject: [lojban] [lojban.org #92] Re: Your lujvo records in Jbovlaste Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 4462 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list The initials convention is very useful for lujvo makers in order to understand how each component of the lujvo contributes to its overall meaning, but it does not look nice in a dictionary. I would prefer that the definitions of lujvo look just like the definitions of gismu. The nitty-gritty of how the lujvo was constructed should be recorded, but it should not be part of the final presentation, in my opinion. It makes lujvo definitions look weird. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/