From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu Mar 13 10:10:48 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:10:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18tXAA-00082Q-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:10:42 -0800 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:10:42 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Cc: Bob Le Chevalier , Nick Nicholas Subject: [lojban] Re: [lojban.org #92] Re: Your lujvo records in Jbovlaste Message-ID: <20030313181041.GC25165@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org, Bob Le Chevalier , Nick Nicholas References: <20030312175019.GD3482@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 4466 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 02:36:46PM -0000, jjllambias2000 wrote: > The initials convention is very useful for lujvo makers in order to > understand how each component of the lujvo contributes to its overall > meaning, but it does not look nice in a dictionary. I disagree quite a bit, actually. I like knowing where lujvo places come from very much, and it takes up very little extra space. However, the dictionary output format is not fixed, and the final arbiter, at this point, is Nick, although I'm sure Bob could overrule him. I'd like to hear from both of them on this issue. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi