From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu Mar 13 10:38:29 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:38:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18tXax-0008Tk-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:38:23 -0800 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:38:23 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: spofu skami Message-ID: <20030313183823.GH25165@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030313181651.GD25165@digitalkingdom.org> <20030313132058.L85179-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030313132058.L85179-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 4479 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 01:22:54PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > 'nirna' means things that neuron, or are neuron-like or that do what > neurons do, which isn't restricted to Neurons. It seems that Neurons > can go into nirna x1, but there are lo nirna that aren't Neurons. neuron: 1. Has dozens, sometimes hundreds of connections to other neurons. 2. Collates inbound data as an aggregate to decide whether to send outbound data. 3. Has a wide range of physical shapes, but generally consists of a bundle of goo attached to a long rod of goo with some feelers off the end of the rod. 4. Conists mostly of carbon, with some nitrogen, oxygen, and other trace elements. I believe those are all the major necessary and sufficient features of a neuron. Not a *SINGLE* *ONE* of those points applies to an ethernet cable, a fiber optice cable, a small number of networked computers, or a sigle computer data switch. NONE OF THEM. NOT ONE. You could argue that point #1 matches a sufficiently large group of computer switches, but that's *it*. Neurons pass data in a way that is *fundamentally* different from every network structure that humans have ever built, unless you count experimental devices whose sole purpose is to emulate neurons. They are not compatible in any way, and if you think they are, I'd say the burden of proof is on you. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi