From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Fri Mar 21 14:39:19 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:39:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 18wVAQ-00050v-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:39:14 -0800
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id D0C834CBF; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:39:15 -0500 (EST)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Organization: dis
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: bakykakpa
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:39:14 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <200303211204.46424.phma@webjockey.net> <20030321174006.GB5560@digitalkingdom.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030321174006.GB5560@digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200303211739.14903.phma@webjockey.net>
X-archive-position: 4572
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Friday 21 March 2003 12:40, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:04:46PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > I just defined {bakykakpa} according to the jvojva, but I'm not sure
> > whether x3 should be the field (source) or the furrow (hole). I think
> > they're both important. Any suggestions?
>
> As neither source word has anything for a source, I'd drop that or let
> it slide to the end.  I mean, what else would you plow?

I am referring to the definition in the gimste:
x1 (agent) digs x2 [material] up/out of x3 [source/hole] with limbs/tool(s) x4

phma
-- 
.i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do
.ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga