From fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com Tue Mar 25 14:23:20 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:23:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 18xwp9-00020U-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:23:15 -0800
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h2PMVuCG000462
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:31:56 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h2PMVuPR000461
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:31:56 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:31:56 -0600
From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: za'ure'u ?
Message-ID: <20030325223156.GA388@allusion.net>
References: <20030325213959.GO3751@digitalkingdom.org> <20030325222055.GA99901@allusion.net> <20030325221609.GU3751@digitalkingdom.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030325221609.GU3751@digitalkingdom.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 4620
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:16:09PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 04:20:55PM -0600, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:39:59PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > > Is the usage of "za'ure'u" for "the next time" considered Standard
> > > Lojban at this point?
> >=20
> > No.
> >=20
> > It could refer to the 10th time also.  Or the time after this one. Or
> > the 2nd time, which happened to come before this time, which is the
> > 5th time.
>=20
> OK.  So, za'u is "greater than the current value by n", right?

"za'u" is "za'upa".  Which is "Some number greater than one".

So it is the some-number-greather-than-oneth repetition of the
occurance.

> If the n defaulted to 1, would that help?
>=20
> If not, is there another way to do this?

Something with prula'i for last, bavla'i for next.

xorxes also has suggested "ca le krefu" for the next.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
                                     sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+gNjcDrrilS51AZ8RAtDWAJ44mJVyRZwC6AHgxp5Ul2+bvFBeDACgwuiF
OovO7DwbKDE3Qk5Rineq1R8=
=lnaw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24--