From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Thu Mar 27 18:28:49 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 27 Mar 2003 18:28:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from web20502.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.226.137]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 18yjbo-0005oC-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 18:28:44 -0800 Message-ID: <20030328022843.97000.qmail@web20502.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.69.2.52] by web20502.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 23:28:43 ART Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 23:28:43 -0300 (ART) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Jorge=20Llamb=EDas?= Subject: [lojban] Re: lojban word wrapping. To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20030327194600.02e3cc30@pop.east.cox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-archive-position: 4663 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list la noras cusku di'e > While I have no real opinion abou- > t whether it *ought* to be allowe- > d, if it is then there is no reason to have any ru- > les about where the break can occur. > > As long as it is marked that the next line continues the same word, it can > be anywhere. So you would allow breaks like di-'u? Or p-avyseljirna? Every language has its rules about where breaks can occur, and some breaks I think look nicer than others in Lojban by its own internal logic. But in any case this is a matter more related to presentation than anything else. I certainly don't think we need to have any official rules about it. mu'o mi'e xorxes ------------ ¡Internet GRATIS es Yahoo! Conexión! Usuario "yahoo", contraseña "yahoo". Desde Buenos Aires, 4004-1010. Otras ciudades: http://conexion.yahoo.com.ar/avanzados.html