From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Sat Mar 29 19:51:25 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 29 Mar 2003 19:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 18zTqn-0001wC-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 19:51:17 -0800
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 0C3B82507; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 03:51:23 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Organization: dis
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Most confusing def in jbovlaste
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 22:51:22 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200303292251.22526.phma@webjockey.net>
X-archive-position: 4686
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

Looking over the unvoted words, I came upon the following definition for 
{be'aspe}:

x1 is a married with parent [of son] x2 with omit x3 with married to-son x4.

I nominate it for the most confusing definition award. Any other nominations?

phma
-- 
.i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do
.ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga
.icu'u la ma'atman.