From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sat Mar 29 20:56:45 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 29 Mar 2003 20:56:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18zUs1-0002OU-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 20:56:37 -0800 Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 20:56:37 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Most confusing def in jbovlaste Message-ID: <20030330045637.GZ28386@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <200303292251.22526.phma@webjockey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200303292251.22526.phma@webjockey.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 4687 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 10:51:22PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > Looking over the unvoted words, I came upon the following > definition for {be'aspe}: > > x1 is a married with parent [of son] x2 with omit x3 with married > to-son x4. That would have been automatically added from the NORALUJv data. Since the formats were completely different, some compromises had to be made. 8) Please feel free to submit an alternate definition. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi