From pnewton@gmx.de Wed Apr 02 05:33:14 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 02 Apr 2003 05:33:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postman.arcor-online.net ([151.189.0.87])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 190iMV-0001I8-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 05:33:07 -0800
Received: from hamwpne1 (pc1-oxfd1-5-cust27.oxfd.cable.ntl.com [62.254.134.27])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by postman.arcor-online.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h32DX2EZ069839
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:33:04 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Philip Newton" <pnewton@gmx.de>
Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 15:31:07 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [lojban] Re: le jdaselsku pe lo nunjdajirgau .e lo cesysai
Message-ID: <3E8B023B.30367.16E6360@localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <20030401224911.GA829@mit.edu>
References: <3E8964E6.21679.34364A@localhost>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-description: Mail message body
X-archive-position: 4711
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 1 Apr 2003 at 17:49, Rob Speer wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 10:07:34AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
> > I couldn't find a place for the order itself in {minde} so I added one. 
> > Hence I call a commandment a {te cesmi'e}.
> 
> There's no place for the command itself because it's in the abstraction.
> A command is a {nu minde}. A commandment would be a {nu cesmi'e}.
> 
> Or perhaps some other abstractor besides nu, but you get the idea.

Hm. So how would you say "his (ko'X) commandments which he (ko'X) has 
given them (ko'Y)"?

{le ko'X nu cesmi'e noi ko'X pu cesmi'e ko'Y} ?
{le nu cesmi'e be ko'X bei ko'Y be'o} ?
Something else?

mu'o mi'e filip.
-- 
filip.niutyn. <pnewton@gmx.de>