From Jlsperanza@aol.com Fri Apr 04 11:24:38 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 04 Apr 2003 11:24:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from imo-m03.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.6]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 191Wng-00011y-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 11:24:32 -0800 Received: from Jlsperanza@aol.com by imo-m03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.21.) id d.9.e3c3bfa (4552) for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:23:53 -0500 (EST) From: Jlsperanza@aol.com Message-ID: <9.e3c3bfa.2bbf35c8@aol.com> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:23:52 EST Subject: [lojban] Negation To: lojban-list@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_9.e3c3bfa.2bbf35c8_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10629 X-archive-position: 4725 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: Jlsperanza@aol.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --part1_9.e3c3bfa.2bbf35c8_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks to xod@thestonecutters.net and James F. Carter for the references -- in Re: 'Not' and Negation in Lojban (and Other Artificial Languages', to, respectively, to http://www.lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar/chapter15.html http://www.math.ucla.edu/~jimc/guaspi/vocab2.html I found it all fascinating. Xod writes: >feel free to inquire if you have any more questions. I wonder if there is a study (or statement) relating the current approaches with such proponents Artificial Languages in England such as Bishop Wilkins, of the Royal Society, way back in 1668 (John Wilkins, "An Essay Towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Language". London: Gellibrand and Martin). Cheers, JL J L Speranza --part1_9.e3c3bfa.2bbf35c8_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks to xod@thestonecutters.net and James F. Carter=20= for the references -- in Re:  'Not' and Negation in Lojban (and Other A= rtificial Languages', to, respectively, to

http://www.lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar/chapter15.html
http://www.math.ucla.edu/~jimc/guaspi/vocab2.html

I found it all fascinating.

Xod writes:

>feel free to inquire if you have any more questions.

I wonder if there is a study (or statement) relating the current approaches=20= with such proponents Artificial Languages in England such as Bishop Wilkins,= of the Royal Society, way back in 1668 (John Wilkins, "An Essay Towards a R= eal Character and a Philosophical Language". London: Gellibrand and Martin).=

Cheers,

JL
J L Speranza
 --part1_9.e3c3bfa.2bbf35c8_boundary--