From gregory.dyke@epfl.ch Wed Apr 16 03:13:18 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail0.epfl.ch ([128.178.50.57])
	by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 195jsJ-0001C5-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:10:43 -0700
Received: (qmail 16753 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2003 10:10:36 -0000
Received: from icin2pc71.epfl.ch (HELO ICIN2PC71W) (128.178.158.171)
  by mail0.epfl.ch with SMTP; 16 Apr 2003 10:10:36 -0000
Message-ID: <003501c30400$6c9aa0d0$ab9eb280@ic.intranet.epfl.ch>
From: "Gregory Dyke" <gregory.dyke@epfl.ch>
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
References: <b7j7el+3fhn@eGroups.com>
Subject: [lojban] Re: mi'e
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:10:36 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-archive-position: 4792
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: gregory.dyke@epfl.ch
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list



> It was parsed by jbofi'e, but with wrong semantics. Of course,
> {nu facki} needs {le} in front of it! And it seems {segugdrkoria}
> is not recognized as I intended... Should I say {selgugdrkoria},
> using lujvo {selgugde}?

why using selgugde?

When type 2/3 fu'ivla are constructed, the main idea is to have them
preceded with a semantical category. so gugdrkoria
>
> mi'e sanxiyn.