From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Fri Apr 18 15:39:49 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 196eWF-00022I-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:39:43 -0700
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 323E137E5; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 22:39:18 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Organization: dis
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] Re: ynai
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 18:39:16 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFGEICDDAA.ragnarok@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFGEICDDAA.ragnarok@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200304181839.17563.phma@webjockey.net>
X-archive-position: 4845
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Friday 18 April 2003 18:30, Craig wrote:
> >".y" is in selma'o Y, not UI - can it really be negated?
>
> Y shouldn't be negatable. Y is not negatable in actual usage. The Book does
> not mention Y being negatable. Jbofi'e thinks Y is negatable. Jordan tells
> me that the BNF disagrees. Hrm, looks like Y is not negatable.

What about {mi viska le bloti .ui .y. nai}?