From sentto-44114-19461-1051444457-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Sun Apr 27 04:54:58 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 27 Apr 2003 04:54:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n37.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.105]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 199kk8-0007jB-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 04:54:52 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-19461-1051444457-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.66.96] by n37.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Apr 2003 11:54:18 -0000 X-Sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 27 Apr 2003 11:54:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 40670 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2003 11:54:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 Apr 2003 11:54:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lmsmtp03.st1.spray.net) (212.78.202.113) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2003 11:54:15 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-61-51.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.61.51]) by lmsmtp03.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4156F3D03B for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 13:54:14 +0200 (MEST) To: "Lojban@Yahoogroups. Com" Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 12:54:12 +0100 Subject: [lojban] BPFK phpbb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 X-archive-position: 4960 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list I can see that a great deal of hard work & expertise has gone into setting this up. But it's unlikely that it will be practicable for me to participate unless I can compose contributions off-line with the freedom of composition that email offers. If the BPFK could move its deliberations to a forum in which it is possible to reply by email, I would be pleased, because it would make it practicable for me to participate. I suspect that the low level of participation & activity in the current setup is evidence that I am not alone in finding the current setup impractical. Respectfully, --And. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions. http://us.click.yahoo.com/O10svD/Me7FAA/AG3JAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/