From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Apr 28 14:29:41 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19AGBd-0003RF-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:29:21 -0700 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:29:21 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) Message-ID: <20030428212921.GL22216@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030428205116.GH22216@digitalkingdom.org> <20030428171103.K32091-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030428171103.K32091-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 4992 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 05:25:38PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote: > If you want to see what was proposed, then check the subject > header of this mail. Oh, really? And under what encoding scheme does the subject header specify all the grammar changes that will be necessary to remove selma'o NAI? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi