From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Tue Apr 29 05:35:20 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 05:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web20502.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.226.137])
	by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19AUKH-0002wM-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 05:35:13 -0700
Message-ID: <20030429123512.20295.qmail@web20502.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web20502.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 05:35:12 PDT
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 05:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>
Subject: [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <20030429011132.GA1205@allusion.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-archive-position: 5004
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


la djorden cusku di'e

> > > things like "leka klama keinai cu xamgu".
> > 
> > I would say it's equivalent to {na'e bo le ka klama cu xamgu}.
[...]
> It's not how it works now, and if it were how it worked and it were
> in UI, then using nai after a terminator as I suggested above would
> have Weird Effects; it could not be equivalent to a na'ebo in front
> of the last sumti.

Indicators used after terminators apply to the whole construction
closed by the terminator, there is nothing new about that.

{kei} closes {ka} however, not {le}, so I should have said 
it is equivalent to {le na'e ka klama cu xamgu} or perhaps
to {le ka nai klama cu xamgu}. (Maybe those two are equivalent?) 

> What does nu'inai mean?
> nu'i nai ge do mi gi mi do nu'u citka

I would presume it is equivalent to:

  nu'i ganai do mi ginai mi do citka

applying DeMorgan's.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com