From fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com Tue Apr 29 07:21:50 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19AVz8-0006Cq-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:21:30 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h3TEXKsr005275
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:33:20 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3/Submit) id h3TEXJoq005274
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:33:19 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:33:19 -0500
From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb)
Message-ID: <20030429143319.GA5227@allusion.net>
References: <20030428205116.GH22216@digitalkingdom.org> <5.2.0.9.0.20030428212900.0390d0b0@pop.east.cox.net> <20030429033514.76205c83.rizen@surreality.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030429033514.76205c83.rizen@surreality.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 5005
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 03:35:14AM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:37:08 -0400
> Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
> > >This topic was inspired by Holy Usage, not pure abstract
> > >tinkering.
> >=20
> > It was inspired by jboske-ist habits, and people forgetting that the
> > byfy is NOT jboske.
>=20
> Well, to be fair, I'm no a jboskepre, but I have occaisionally written
> ka'enai by accident. (Simply not realizing that nai can't go there, even
> though it seems like it should.)

It only seems like it should because you mislearned CAhA.  CAhA are
not analagous to PU and FAhA; check your BNF.

> Does this justify a language change? Probably not. (Although I must say
> that aestetically (probably misspelled that), ka'enai sounds much nicer
> than na'eka'e.)

na ka'e sounds even better.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
                                     sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+ro0vDrrilS51AZ8RArD5AKDKhwjPsJ+TR+JUecFPidouDUVDDgCgvfHE
ffOc1IdaJJMRZmLav9qHh40=
=A3DW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--