From fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com Tue Apr 29 20:38:18 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19AiPr-0000NI-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:37:56 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h3U3nmsr011289
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:49:48 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3/Submit) id h3U3nhxE011286
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:49:43 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:49:43 -0500
From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: BPFK: Salvo 2 (list naziing)
Message-ID: <20030430034943.GE10708@allusion.net>
References: <p05200f3cbad4e1fcb6b4@[128.250.86.174]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lteA1dqeVaWQ9QQl"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <p05200f3cbad4e1fcb6b4@[128.250.86.174]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 5042
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--lteA1dqeVaWQ9QQl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 12:14:45PM +1000, Nick Nicholas wrote:
> Is the proper venue for technical discussion of Lojban the main lojban li=
st?
>=20
> No.
>=20
> Then why the hell is this list being flooded with technical=20
> discussion of Lojban? That is *why* jboske was created. And jboske=20
> was not created exclusively for tinkering discussions. Anyone who=20
> claims so is lying. Anyone who wants to discuss technical details of=20
> Lojban (of which this clearly is an instance), but refuses to read=20
> jboske and wants to use this list instead, is being ornery.

Well.  I don't actually *know* why jboske was created.  But it is
certainly true that a lot of what could be called "tinkering
discussions" take place there (And just posted a "screw the BNF"
message a day or two ago, for example).

But that's nonimportant; I agree that it is better to seperate
open-ended technical discussion from the main list, and that's what
jboske has become primarily for, now.

[...]
> Meanwhile, if you want to harangue each other about whether UI=3DNAI is=
=20
> a good thing or not, before the formal presentation on phpbb, then=20
> take it to jboske. FFS.
[...]

Agreed.  Too bad I didn't read your message before sending replies.

Future replies from me will go to jboske.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
                                     sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--lteA1dqeVaWQ9QQl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+r0fXDrrilS51AZ8RAsq9AJsGNYjuTSg2+6uhFFzADna7RlYsswCdEKZh
xadxO0ld5hiZX8+eQnriObs=
=3MVo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--lteA1dqeVaWQ9QQl--