From fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com Sun May 04 11:33:12 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 04 May 2003 11:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19COII-0006Ke-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 04 May 2003 11:33:02 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h44Igq67074858
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun, 4 May 2003 13:42:57 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h44IgphB074857
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 4 May 2003 13:42:51 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 13:42:51 -0500
From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Some ideas/questions (long)
Message-ID: <20030504184251.GA74689@allusion.net>
References: <20030504154745.GX28808@ccil.org> <b93gtc+o0i6@eGroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b93gtc+o0i6@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-archive-position: 5111
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, May 04, 2003 at 04:59:24PM -0000, oskar2379 wrote:
[...]
> > It *could* be expressed as a lujvo.  For that matter, "mamta" could=20
> be
> > expressed as a lujvo too.  The gismu are not intended to be a=20
> minimal
> > basis set.
>=20
> You're right, mamta should be parent-female :)
> Maybe that will be the first thing I try to do...split gismu up. It=20
> will take a while but I'm only 16 so I have a lot of time.
[...]

I don't think mamta requires x1 to be a female.  It just has to be
someone who is acting maternally to x2 (the entry specifically says
it is not just about biological relationships).

So perhaps parent-female (fetsyrirni) is a useful predicate; but I
don't think it is the same as mamta.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
                                     sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+tV8qDrrilS51AZ8RAgIBAJ4/sqybs4ao230kVYRFe9euu1bOvwCeM406
mLX8WavDjucdzRpIkUNsnBE=
=shbp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--