From xod@thestonecutters.net Mon May 05 08:02:50 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 05 May 2003 08:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19ChU0-0008CJ-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 05 May 2003 08:02:24 -0700 Received: from granite.thestonecutters.net (localhost.thestonecutters.net [127.0.0.1]) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h45EwYEo047669 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:58:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id h45EwXHZ047666 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:58:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) X-Authentication-Warning: granite.thestonecutters.net: xod owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 10:58:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Invent Yourself To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Mongolian-based Lojban orthography In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20030505105143.C46975-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 5126 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, 5 May 2003, c1tk wrote: > Hello, > > [Craig:] > > > As the creator of the one on the Wiki, I should explain that it was > > intended as a jumping-off point for someone with actual knowledge of > > mongolian to fix. > > I do not know much about Mongolian either actually -- I just got the > information I have from several sources. > > [robin.bcc:] > > > Nice, but please don't do that white text on black background thing! > > *scratches head* *wonders what is wrong with white on black* > > Erm... after seeing so many Jihad being waged on the topic of user interface > design, I do not feel like drastically changing my home page's design > without a good reason (where a good reason is, well, a reason that is good). > Someone please help me out of this lemma...... le'e kanla cu tatpi tu'a lo lerfu be fi'o selska lo blabi bei va'o lo xekri .iju mukti do .eicu'i -- Neoconservatism in the realm of foreign policy is merely Trotskyism-turned-inside-out: a militant internationalism fueled by U.S. taxpayer dollars and backed up by the mightiest military the world has ever seen.