From MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Mon May 05 15:13:23 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 05 May 2003 15:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imo-m05.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.8]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19CoCv-0002UQ-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 05 May 2003 15:13:13 -0700 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-m05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.22.) id d.168.1e2ea13d (4446) for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 16:45:42 -0400 (EDT) From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Message-ID: <168.1e2ea13d.2be82776@wmconnect.com> Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 16:45:42 EDT Subject: [lojban] semantic space To: lojban-list@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_168.1e2ea13d.2be82776_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 sub 12 X-archive-position: 5130 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --part1_168.1e2ea13d.2be82776_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit John Cowan wrote: > >Lojban doesn't really classify relations at all: > the gismu list is a large and disorderly bag whose merit is that it > blankets semantic space, has this really been demonstrated? stevo --part1_168.1e2ea13d.2be82776_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable John Cowan wrote:

>Lojban doesn't really c= lassify relations at all:
the gismu list is a large and disorderly bag whose merit is that it
blankets semantic space,


has this really been demonstrated?
stevo --part1_168.1e2ea13d.2be82776_boundary--