From xod@thestonecutters.net Sat May 10 14:20:42 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 10 May 2003 14:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Eblk-0008FB-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 10 May 2003 14:20:36 -0700 Received: from granite.thestonecutters.net (localhost.thestonecutters.net [127.0.0.1]) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4ALGhEo097513 for ; Sat, 10 May 2003 17:16:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id h4ALGhRq097510 for ; Sat, 10 May 2003 17:16:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) X-Authentication-Warning: granite.thestonecutters.net: xod owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 17:16:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Invent Yourself To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: semantic space In-Reply-To: <54.10f93f9e.2beec50f@wmconnect.com> Message-ID: <20030510171337.P97327-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 5209 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Off topic but annoying: Why are both addresses for the mailing list listed in the header? Each user should stick to only one, and let the fine bridging software deal with the rest. On Sat, 10 May 2003 MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote: > In a message dated 2003-05-06 10:58:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > lojban@yahoogroups.com writes: > > > That does nothing for you, as you have no idea (let alone evidence or > > *proof*!) that whatever list you use is complete. > > > there is in language in general. finding new concepts is not easy, as > Suzette Haden Elgin describes in her novel "Native Tongue". Finding new concepts is trivial. Convincing the skeptic, though, is impossible. -- Neoconservatism in the realm of foreign policy is merely Trotskyism-turned-inside-out: a militant internationalism fueled by U.S. taxpayer dollars and backed up by the mightiest military the world has ever seen.