From sentto-44114-19777-1053001012-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Thu May 15 05:17:35 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 15 May 2003 05:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n16.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.71]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19GHfn-0007lu-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Thu, 15 May 2003 05:17:23 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-19777-1053001012-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.196] by n16.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 May 2003 12:16:52 -0000 X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 15 May 2003 12:16:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 68487 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 12:16:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 May 2003 12:16:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 May 2003 12:16:51 -0000 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Thu, 15 May 2003 12:38:23 +0100 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 15 May 2003 13:18:16 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 To: cowan , opoudjis Cc: lojban From: And Rosta X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:18:05 +0100 Subject: [lojban] Re: Alternative Orthography. Yes, another one. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 5275 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list > Should any BPFK-sponsored publication (such as a supplement to CLL) > mention Latin-based alt orthographies? Or the other ones? My > suspicion is no; anyone have strong feelings on the subject? pe'i BPFK should put forward the motion that any orthography that corresponds unambiguously to the official one should be deemed to fall within prescription-conformant usage. Many people have strong feelings about the official orthography -- some people loathe it, others loathe any deviation from it. I think that these sorts of battles should be negotiated through usage. --And. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/uetFAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/