From xod@thestonecutters.net Thu May 15 07:39:39 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 15 May 2003 07:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19GJt3-0002Sg-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 15 May 2003 07:39:13 -0700 Received: from granite.thestonecutters.net (localhost.thestonecutters.net [127.0.0.1]) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4FEZN3F025433 for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 10:35:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id h4FEZN5f025430 for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 10:35:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) X-Authentication-Warning: granite.thestonecutters.net: xod owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 10:35:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Invent Yourself To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Alternative Orthography. Yes, another one. In-Reply-To: <3EC3BFF5.6040600@bilkent.edu.tr> Message-ID: <20030515103412.M24498-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 5280 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, 15 May 2003, Robin wrote: > Theodore Reed (bancus) wrote: > > On Thu, 15 May 2003 12:17:08 +0200 (CEST) > > Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > > > > > >>>ju!liet.bin!oc. or juli!et.bino!c. or whatever. > >> > >>I'm sorry, Robin, but I find this incredibly hard to read. Re the > >>first example, I can't decide if it's JUliet, juLIET, or juLIet. > > > > > > I agree but for different reasons. Unless I look really close, it looks like an i or an l. > > > I have the same problem reading code on web pages sometimes. How about > a caret? How about you two use larger fonts until you can afford sharper monitors? But the caret was already proposed, and is discussed somewhere on the wiki. I don't know where. -- Neoconservatism in the realm of foreign policy is merely Trotskyism-turned-inside-out: a militant internationalism fueled by U.S. taxpayer dollars and backed up by the mightiest military the world has ever seen.